reddevil0728 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 The way it is represent sux... the colours are too close to each other and the height are all abt the same... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crafty bison Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Agree. Back to x-y-z-a-b please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddevil0728 Posted November 16, 2008 Author Share Posted November 16, 2008 yes up................. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeoVieira Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 I prefer the new way to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddevil0728 Posted November 16, 2008 Author Share Posted November 16, 2008 I prefer the new way to be honest. How the hell do u tell the difference? the difference is so subtle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeoVieira Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 No, it's really easy to tell the difference. Actually, it's easier to see if a players has perfomed well on the last 5 matches, or if he has been unconsistent or is playing badly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddevil0728 Posted November 16, 2008 Author Share Posted November 16, 2008 No, it's really easy to tell the difference. Actually, it's easier to see if a players has perfomed well on the last 5 matches, or if he has been unconsistent or is playing badly. How?????????? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeoVieira Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 Easy. If the bars are mostly dark green and higher than normal, the player is performing well. But if they're mostly light green and shorter that means the players is not performing well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddevil0728 Posted November 16, 2008 Author Share Posted November 16, 2008 Easy. If the bars are mostly dark green and higher than normal, the player is performing well. But if they're mostly light green and shorter that means the players is not performing well. the diff is so subtle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bardia Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 Agree. Back to x-y-z-a-b please. I like the old way better too. Are there any mods that will switch it back? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSGTroyer Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 I don't know because, as American, I only have the demo, but it could be something a skinner could deal with. I suspect they did it the new way because the decimals increaded the column width too much and no-one wanted to use an INT() function to revert to the old ways, since, then, what's the point of the decimal? Certianly, a skinner will be able to create icons that will be easier to differentiate. Thing is, I suspect there is already a full range of colors and bar lengths available, but their ranges might be from 1-10. Since the vast majority of ratings fall between 5-8, there's a lot of color/bar lengths we seldom see... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
playmaker Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 I find that when I look at my team as a whole my first 11 are mainly dark green, while my subs are clearly lighter. The odd poor performance really stands out on screen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddevil0728 Posted November 16, 2008 Author Share Posted November 16, 2008 I find that when I look at my team as a whole my first 11 are mainly dark green, while my subs are clearly lighter. The odd poor performance really stands out on screen. false impression that ur players are playing well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
playmaker Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 false impression that ur players are playing well Not really. The only impression I get is that I have picked the right first 11 (with one or two borderline decisions). I expect their form to be better, otherwise there is no point in form being in the game in words or graphics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeediuS Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 don't know if you havent realised, but you can mouse over each wee bar and it will tell you what the exact figure is. i prefer them being shown this way, as you can see trends far easier, either slight downwards or slight upwards now stand out clearly without having to read each individual number. i dont think it's that big a thing if there's two bars so similar, but when you start noticing a change in the bars over time, then it is more visible Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ljuba82 Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 I also preffer the older method, but problem with it is that now you have decimal ratings and that you need much more physical space for form. so if they return that, we wiln't have some other information on selection page! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyke Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 They had to change it because they've gone for a decimal rating this year, there wasn't room for five decimal ratings side by side. As someone said earlier you can mouse over the colour ratings to get a value Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
micro-ice Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 i prefer the old way. i just dont know how to read the bars wihout accessing the players profile and reading it from there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bod1035 Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 Why dont u just put the pointer over each bar and it shows u the rating for that match, then u can clearly see the difference between each one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddevil0728 Posted November 16, 2008 Author Share Posted November 16, 2008 Why dont u just put the pointer over each bar and it shows u the rating for that match, then u can clearly see the difference between each one. troublesome Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crafty bison Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 I suspect they did it the new way because the decimals increaded the column width too much and no-one wanted to use an INT() function to revert to the old ways, since, then, what's the point of the decimal? But on your fixtures list, if you click on the preview of a game you've already played, ratings are displayed rounded to the nearest integer (7, 8 etc.). This is probably because they forgot to change it though.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djwilko6 Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 troublesome More troublesome than clicking a players name and read it from there? Grow up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ism-scfc Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 The new way is definitely better Visual bars are much easier to read than a load of numbers. Differentiating between colours might be difficult for the colour blind, but most people should have no problems whatsoever Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedro griffin Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 If it isn't broke why fix it? It was much easier to tell how your player was doing with the form displayed in numbers. I don't see any difference between a player having a rating of 7 and a player having a rating of 7.2 What's the point in changing it? It isn't necessary Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bod1035 Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 troublesome That is lame. How troublesome is it to move your mouse cursor over a bar. You dont even have to click the button. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reece34 Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 It takes too long to move your cursor over everyone. If i have numbers in view its easier to see exactly what the player has rated. Usually if one of my players rated 6 or under in 2 games i would kick his arse. But now ive got no idea with highlight every player and every rating whether he scored 6,6.5 or 7 If it stays this way how do you change the colours to make them easier to see??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeoVieira Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 Sincerely, if the little bars is shorter than common and is light green (almost yellow) then the players is performing badly, but if the bars are mostly taller and are dark green it's because he's perfoming well. Is it really that hard? You just need to know how to differ light green from dark green really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reece34 Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 But that difference in colour could be the difference between a 6 and a 7.5 which is quite alot. If you have numbers in front of you its plain and simple. Its like attribute colours they are always the first thing i change because they suck and are always too close to each other. So i will have red,green,orange and grey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddevil0728 Posted November 17, 2008 Author Share Posted November 17, 2008 More troublesome than clicking a players name and read it from there?Grow up. How can you compare like that when originally I don't even have to move my hand to see the ratings in numerical digits. That is lame. How troublesome is it to move your mouse cursor over a bar. You dont even have to click the button. The thing is I don't even have to move previously! See the difference? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bod1035 Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 How can you compare like that when originally I don't even have to move my hand to see the ratings in numerical digits.The thing is I don't even have to move previously! See the difference? Well i sure hope u have a bucket next to your computer seeing as u cant be bothered to move, or things might get quite messy;) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptr Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 I'd like to add my voice to those who like the new representation. Tbh, I rarely used to look at form, but now, there's an average rating for the last 5 games, plus the bars so you can see if they were wildly inconsistent. Much better imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddevil0728 Posted November 17, 2008 Author Share Posted November 17, 2008 Well i sure hope u have a bucket next to your computer seeing as u cant be bothered to move, or things might get quite messy;) You don't understand? I am saying its unfair to compare clicking with no clicking when previously I don't even have to do anything... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Bladesman Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 We can't go back to the old representation, since it wouldn't fit with the extra feedback now. It can't show 7-6-7-7-8, for example, as the stats would actually now be 7.1-6.4-7.3-7.2-7.6. You will find that if you hover over the bars in the form chart there with the middle finger on the hand pointing to the bar of interest, a popup will appear that will tell you the rating value for that bar (say 7.1). It could do with popping up a bit quicker, but the info is still there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bod1035 Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 We can't go back to the old representation, since it wouldn't fit with the extra feedback now. It can't show 7-6-7-7-8, for example, as the stats would actually now be 7.1-6.4-7.3-7.2-7.6. You will find that if you hover over the bars in the form chart there with the middle finger on the hand pointing to the bar of interest, a popup will appear that will tell you the rating value for that bar (say 7.1).It could do with popping up a bit quicker, but the info is still there. But some people are complaining that it takes to much effort to move a mouse cursor over a bar, which is amazing. Yes it may have been 0.5 seconds quicker to see the stat in number form , but as Super Bladesman and others have said , now the figure shows decimals aswell this is the best way for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jozza800 Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 - Is it an image in the skin that can be edited, - Is it a diffrent colour an height for each decimal rating (different height/colour from 7.1 to 7.2) or 1 colour/height for each whole number (basicaly 10 colours/heights) If the above are right then it could be modded by changing the graphics, changing the coloured/height bars into numbers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam_Man Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 I agree, the colour range could do with tweaking as its all too similar at present. The actual idea of using bars is nice though, but have to admit its not as clear as before. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam_Man Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 But some people are complaining that it takes to much effort to move a mouse cursor over a bar, which is amazing. No its not, the whole purpose of the form displayed is to get a quick at a glance view of the teams form. To have to mouse hover over every game is absurd and completely defies the point. The bars are fine but the colours could be improved as I agree the differences arent big enough for it to be as clear as it could be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.