New Transfer System?

What is going to be so different? (i know the code re-written.)

Is it fully tested (like been used on FML?), no errors or bugs?

the code has been rewritten- i think it is more realistic rather than cosmetic changes

The transfer system should replicate real life transfer situations a lot better than previuos versions.

I know I'm probably being a bit pessimistic here but I have a horrible feeling that it will be just as hard to sell players as its always been.

I hope its harder to loan in players

I know I'm probably being a bit pessimistic here but I have a horrible feeling that it will be just as hard to sell players as its always been.

But why would SI bother rewriting the code if it turns out to be exactly the same as it was previously

So will the new transfer system allow me to negotiate a price for a player properly? Because on FM08 it goes something like this most of the time:

- I bid £8mill for a player

- Players club demands £10mill

- I bid £9mill

- Players club demands £11mill

But why would SI bother rewriting the code if it turns out to be exactly the same as it was previously

Because they've left out\forgot something that should have been included. Wouldn't be the first time this has happened.

So will the new transfer system allow me to negotiate a price for a player properly? Because on FM08 it goes something like this most of the time:

- I bid £8mill for a player

- Players club demands £10mill

- I bid £9mill

- Players club demands £11mill

It's so annoying when that happens.

So will the new transfer system allow me to negotiate a price for a player properly? Because on FM08 it goes something like this most of the time:

- I bid £8mill for a player

- Players club demands £10mill

- I bid £9mill

- Players club demands £11mill

Always found Chelsea were the absolute worse for doing this.

I assume this negotiation issue is one of the main reasons for improving it. I suspect there were bits of code there that had been around for 10 years or so with no-one remembering 100% exactly what they do

Because they've left out\forgot something that should have been included. Wouldn't be the first time this has happened.

It would make perfect sense to thoroughly test something which has been written from scratch though