Ranbir Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 Hello, I've had thoughts from that no-arrow thread and the inevitable greater focus on the sliders, which I've been told will provide greater feedback and explanation as to what each point on the slider will actually mean. In addition to that, I think that, while players having preferred moves is nice ; do they do it all the time or based on their attributes to try and to it when it is the right time to do so? Either way, I think to help with providing 'man management' it would be greater to have greater options in the player instructions, some which can be taken from the ppms. For example, having the check box, "hold up" is great. It would be nicer, to also have the ability to instruct a striker to "move into channels", your wide men can be instructed to "cut inside" or try to "hug the line" or to instruct a player to come deep to receive the ball. I feel that reflects a greater representation than adding or deleting a player's preferred moves. It may just be you don't want them doing it for a certain game; or certain period within it. I don't expect all ppms to be transferable to instructions, but I see quite a few that can and can help in providing the freedom of managing a specific player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YesYesOhYay Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 it sounds good, because then you can implement more in depth tactics Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DietSpam Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 There is arrows, just not side ones. Tactics is more controlled now. Arrows only go forward and back. And even at that i think they are limited to how forward they can go, if i remember correctly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHARLIERODD Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 I like the move into channels idea. The ultimate Fernando Torres tactic! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 They don't do it all the time, otherwise they'd blast it when faced with an open goal if they had "shoots with power", or they'd "get into opposition's penalty area" when the other team were attacking Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranbir Posted October 19, 2008 Author Share Posted October 19, 2008 Ok, it was a wonder. But if there are no arrows to have a player cut inside and dependency is only on a ppm, then an instruction option would be great. The preference(or lack of) of certain moves can put some emphasis on a player having the discipline or not do so. I think of Gerrard(an example), who likes to cut inside, if played wide. How likely is he not to end up drifting in, even if you cut his freedom? Realistically, I don't think Gerrard could truly stop himself from drifting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DietSpam Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 More Cow Bell! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DietSpam Posted October 19, 2008 Share Posted October 19, 2008 Ok, it was a wonder. But if there are no arrows to have a player cut inside and dependency is only on a ppm, then an instruction option would be great. The preference(or lack of) of certain moves can put some emphasis on a player having the discipline or not do so.I think of Gerrard(an example), who likes to cut inside, if played wide. How likely is he not to end up drifting in, even if you cut his freedom? Realistically, I don't think Gerrard could truly stop himself from drifting. There are Arrows! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.