Dr Eskenen Un Un Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Which one is better option ? 1 - Adebayor - Transfer Fee 5 million / Salary 150 000 per week 2 - Fernando Liorente - Transfer Fee 20 million / Salary 80 000 per week Both quite similar in term of ability but which one better in financial ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Over a five year contract, Llorente works out about £3m cheaper, so there's not a huge amount of difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eugster Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 What about bonus's and all that? I'd imagine Ade is also on a larger appearance and goal fee. And of course if you need to buy anyone else then Ade is cheaper and leaves you with an extra 15 million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coentrao Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 It also depends on the role that you are playing, physically Adebayor is a beast with a lot of pace and strength as well while Llorente has better mental attributes and a better personality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCFC_droog Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 I'd go with Llorente every day of the week. Slightly cheaper deal and a better player in game in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AcidBurn Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Llorente is brilliant, I would sign him over Adebayor every time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.