jmw23 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 me and my mate have been arguing who has a better squad spurs or chelsea. He got 6th in the league with spurs and i won the league,f cup and league cup with chelsea he claims he did a better job as tottenhams squad is weaker in depth i disagree help us solve the argument thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWaRFeGa Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Tottenham have much better strength in depth, in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nottingham Forest Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 You can't really compare them imo. Spurs have a better depth to their squad and finishing sixth with them is actually quite poor imo. Chelsea have less depth to their squad, so to win the cups you did with less depth is quite good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenco Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Chelsea have a better first XI, Spurs have the better squad because there is much more depth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chob Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 I'd say Spurs to be honest but Chelsea do have a good first 11. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_Pacino Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Spurs, obviously Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
milnerpoint Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Spurs are better in an FM sense because they have more pace about them. In real life its 50-50, spurs prob have a tiny bit more depth, Chelsea a better overall starting 11 when they are on form. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.