Slawbawn Posted April 3, 2011 Share Posted April 3, 2011 Just a question about these supposed "director" takeovers. Obviously in some cases that only board member is the chairman, with no executives, directors etc etc at the club. What I don't understand is how can a club like this have a "director takeover" when there's no other directors present? The only thing I can think of is a background investor, in the holding company for example, being classed as a director. But if someone like that was to launch a takeover bid in reality wouldn't they and their investors be classed as a consortium? Is this a bug thats been overlooked for the last few FM series (I'm not claiming it to be a bug, before anyone starts moaning and whining), or is it just something that SI haven't put a complete amount of effort into perfecting? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfgrigg Posted April 3, 2011 Share Posted April 3, 2011 It's an oversight, I expect. Probably worth raising it in the bugs' forum so they can take a look at it, or explain if it's actually working as intended. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slawbawn Posted April 3, 2011 Author Share Posted April 3, 2011 Okay, will do. Cheers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanSpur Posted April 3, 2011 Share Posted April 3, 2011 Bobby Charlton took charge of Man Utd in my game, he had to pay £120m for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdanio Posted April 4, 2011 Share Posted April 4, 2011 Bobby Charlton taking over for ridiculous sums of money at ridiculous ages happens too often. The only way this would happen would be as the figurehead of a consortium. He doesn't have the sort of cash the game suggests he personally pays to gain control. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.