GDM9 Posted November 6, 2010 Share Posted November 6, 2010 I am encountering numerous cases where my assistant manager and scouts are claiming that a players best position is not his natural position. In some cases the position that they are stating is his best position is about 3rd or 4th on the list of his accomplished positions. Is this happening for everyone and if so, does anyone know why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDM9 Posted November 9, 2010 Author Share Posted November 9, 2010 Surely this can't just be my game! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexej Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Same for me as well, however I think they might be suggesting where they think they are best suited based on their attributes as opposed to their fav position. For example a AMR/AMC (primary AMR - secondary AMC) with 10 crossing but 18 passing, the assistant/scout might suggest he is best as an AMC as his attributes suit that position better (since crossing is not good). Just a guess, but when it happens to me, that seems to be the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDM9 Posted November 9, 2010 Author Share Posted November 9, 2010 That was my thought as well. It just seems strange that this has changed and nothing has been mentioned. The star ratings are the same for best position as they are for natural so I am wondering if training the best position to natural might result in an increase in star rating. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.