Blanchflower1 Posted June 19, 2008 Share Posted June 19, 2008 What is the use of Investment funds and paying money to shareholders in the form of dividends when your club has a lot of money? Do we benefit from this? Or is the club chairman taking the money from himself? How does the club benefit if your chairman does this? Do you get higher transfer and wage budgets? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerry-Atric Posted June 19, 2008 Share Posted June 19, 2008 this is a business transaction if you have a PLC club then the shareholders will get a % of the profit per season based on how much the club makes. a club like Chelsea for example are Privately owned so wouldn't have shareholders to pay money too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
redUTDgoose Posted June 19, 2008 Share Posted June 19, 2008 I saw you had posted something similar in the editors hideaway earlier, with regards to giving your club ALOT of money to start with... Now if i remember reading something similar to this, posted by someone else, I think the game has an in built limit to how much money and one club can have. I think it is a billion or something like that. The game cant cope with anymore. the chairman then 'invests' it and I dont think you see any benifit, its just the game coping with a ridiculous amount of money. Just be thankful (if you got there by normal in game playing) that you are generating that kind of revenue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phnompenhandy Posted June 19, 2008 Share Posted June 19, 2008 It's called business, son. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakobx Posted June 19, 2008 Share Posted June 19, 2008 Its called bad financial model. SI uses this to decrease the amount of money in the game. Dividents are even payed in clubs where there are no shareholders and such an act would get you in jail for a long time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blanchflower1 Posted June 19, 2008 Author Share Posted June 19, 2008 Originally posted by jakobx:Its called bad financial model. SI uses this to decrease the amount of money in the game. Dividents are even payed in clubs where there are no shareholders and such an act would get you in jail for a long time. Why would SI want to reduce the amount of money in the game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AB-forever Posted June 19, 2008 Share Posted June 19, 2008 Originally posted by Blanchflower1:<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by jakobx: Its called bad financial model. SI uses this to decrease the amount of money in the game. Dividents are even payed in clubs where there are no shareholders and such an act would get you in jail for a long time. Why would SI want to reduce the amount of money in the game? </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Because if they didn't so this, then people would complain when they reach £2.2B or something like that and their balance turns to -£2.2B because of a limit in the programming so it's impossible to have more money than this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.