coady Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Does anyone have a laptop that was purchased for £500 or less that has a reasonable perofrmance on the 5 star rating. i.e. 3* or higher? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hershie Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Funnily enough I have a brand new laptop and am about to install FM and have a look. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbutton Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I have half a star Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahyeahok Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I've just bought a brand new laptop for just over 700 uk pounds and the start up thing rates it as 5star. But i've heard the star rating is broken so i dont know its accuracy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coady Posted September 1, 2010 Author Share Posted September 1, 2010 I only have half a star aswell. Decided to buy one with my wages from summer but don't know which laptop is best to get. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hershie Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Funnily enough I have a brand new laptop and am about to install FM and have a look. 4 1/2 stars. (on 10.0) http://www.amazon.co.uk/Pavilion-dv6-2112sa-Notebook-15-6-inch-Processor/dp/B0034G5G1K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=computers&qid=1283350276&sr=8-1 :thup: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekman Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Disregard what your star rating is. The system doesn't work properly. Hopefully it will either be fixed or removed completely from fm11. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 The star rating doesnt mater. Its flawed. Also before making a thread try searching first. If you search for LAPTOP, see how many threads come up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hershie Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 The system works to the extent that I believe it largely relies on RAM and processor. However it can be distorted because presumably not all possible hardware, nor combinations of, could be tested to check it works as intended. As a very simple means it's adequate though. Laptop has more RAM than my desktop, which also runs more background stuff and is considerably older. Don't disregard stars completely, although obviously you'll be able to tell if they're wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coady Posted September 2, 2010 Author Share Posted September 2, 2010 Can someone tell me which graphics are better? Intel GMA 4500M or ATI Radeon HD 4200. Also are they good enough for football manager? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rich10 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 I have 5 stars on high detail and full stadium graphics but then, bizarrely, the player database recommends I only have 30,000 players loaded. Naturally I completely ignore this and load a custom set far exceeding this and it runs very fast. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Neil Brock Posted September 2, 2010 Administrators Share Posted September 2, 2010 Can someone tell me which graphics are better? Intel GMA 4500M or ATI Radeon HD 4200. Also are they good enough for football manager? Both on the lower scale tbh - http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Both on the lower scale tbh - http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html The question is are they good enough to run Football Manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Neil Brock Posted September 2, 2010 Administrators Share Posted September 2, 2010 Well put it this way, on the back of the box it states as 'system requirements' the Radeon 9800 - this is ranked at 147. The two shown above are ranked 194 and 175 respectively. So as said the graphics cards are very much on the lower scale. They may well run the game just about but they are not recommended as being able to run the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Well put it this way, on the back of the box it states as 'system requirements' the Radeon 9800 - this is ranked at 147.The two shown above are ranked 194 and 175 respectively. So as said the graphics cards are very much on the lower scale. They may well run the game just about but they are not recommended as being able to run the game. Isnt the graphics card only really for the 3D though? If your only playing 2D or commentary it shouldnt really matter, right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevhamster Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 My laptop has a half star rating, and I'm sure the graphics card is lower than the recommended. My processor is actually slower than the stated minimum requirements. But it runs FM perfectly well in my opinion, and I do play using the 3D match view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mg539 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Well put it this way, on the back of the box it states as 'system requirements' the Radeon 9800 - this is ranked at 147.The two shown above are ranked 194 and 175 respectively. So as said the graphics cards are very much on the lower scale. They may well run the game just about but they are not recommended as being able to run the game. To be fair, my laptop has a gma950 which is ranked 242nd on the list and it still plays 3D no problem (though the drivers update have probably been updated if that makes a difference...) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.