masticator Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 i dont know what it is, but i just cant bring myself to sign the silly cartoon faced fools. im a regenist. i dont sign them. i dont care how good their stats are, theyre just not real. theyre like cylons. real players are best. regenism isnt a crime. its just how i am. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I'm the opposite, I don't like signing real players. I like to have the element of surprise with my players and enjoy the fact that no one else will have managed my players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinaldo Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I prefer games in the future with regens myself:D Regenist:( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArsenalFan7 Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I'm the opposite, I don't like signing real players. I like to have the element of surprise with my players and enjoy the fact that no one else will have managed my players. This. But I still hate the ones who look like they've been born from a Elephant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nunnother Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I love the regens, just because it keeps the game going! But the faces are just plain scary sometimes!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
medo24 Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I actually prefer it once the regens start to take over. I get the attached to them and like to see how their careers develop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duck my sick Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I agree with dafuge. Although their faces are a little weird sometimes! SI need to employ the guy who made the regen faces for FMAndersons thread. They look brilliant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Neil Brock Posted February 21, 2010 Administrators Share Posted February 21, 2010 It's NEWGENS not bloody regens! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
masticator Posted February 21, 2010 Author Share Posted February 21, 2010 i dont know. these regens coming over here and taking the jobs from the realsters. its just not right! ha ha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
masticator Posted February 21, 2010 Author Share Posted February 21, 2010 It's NEWGENS not bloody regens! is that politically correct term for them these days? i stand corrected. bloody newgens. taking our jobs. lol:D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 It's NEWGENS not bloody regens! regens, newgens or FRED's. It's all the same to me. regens are like St James' Park, the name may be changed but they still stay the same! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJ234 Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I am the opposite, I love the feeling of not knowing how they are going to turn out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafuge Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 It's NEWGENS not bloody regens! Not Freds? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
masticator Posted February 21, 2010 Author Share Posted February 21, 2010 whats a Fred? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 whats a Fred? a regen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I rush through the early seasons so I don't have to play with real players. Always turn the facegen off though, it's hideous and an immersion killer for me. Scouting and unearthing an unknown newgen and gambling on him because you don't know truely how good his potential is is what gives this game excitement for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobson Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 Ha ha... This has got to be the weirdest thread ever!! :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yid Army Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 You, my friend, have clearly not visited the off-topic forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
speople Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 Surely, a largeish selection of real players's faces could be split into horizontal stripes, and then just randomized for the regens/newgens/freds. They would then look more realistic than the scary buggers who are churned out atm, I can't ever imagine a regen atm going home to meet someone's mum and dad for the 1st time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 Surely, a largeish selection of real players's faces could be split into horizontal stripes, and then just randomized for the regens/newgens/freds.They would then look more realistic than the scary buggers who are churned out atm, I can't ever imagine a regen atm going home to meet someone's mum and dad for the 1st time. But then surely you'd just have lots if different shaded stripes? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0x0r Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I love my FREDs. I'm a little upset that the balance is so far off on FREDs in 10.2... if 10.3 gets FREDs right i'll be a happy man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dking Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I hear what your saying OP. Although not being a complete 'newgenist', It does bother me when I end up having more 'newgens' than real players. Maybe if they had more up to date graphics used for the 'newgen' faces instead of the ridiculously shabby graphics that are being used at the moment, it may not be so hard to accept the 'newgens' into our lands! Down with cylons! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 Not Freds? My thoughts exactly. SI member, expired four years ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 as soon as the regens take over.. i nearly always quit and start again.... the generated player system just isnt up to scratch... and is the only part of the game i feel SI have let us down with and havent really attempted to solve adequately. regens are always much much better and much cheaper then real players.... seems pointless to carry on when my world class players in their peak and inferior to a youth product that i can pick up for pennies Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffious Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I'm a converse regenist; love the little funny-faced blighters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancer1 Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I like signing regens, but the novelty soon comes to an end when you realise just about all of them have fatal flaws in the distribution of their attributes. example: a DC with 18 heading and 3 jumping Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rohkey Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I suffer from regenosis, I sign too many of them. They're just so adorable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacksquare Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 Just turn off the pictures. And I guess you don't go most than a few seasons into the game then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabioke Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 They are ugly bastards with strange attributes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zebanumut Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I'm the opposite, I don't like signing real players. I like to have the element of surprise with my players and enjoy the fact that no one else will have managed my players. cant add much to that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave9ffc Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I do prefer real players too, I never really get into real long term games normally as I like finding "real" hidden talents that come about after a a few seasons who start off young at the beginning but develop slowly. I get attached when my club produces them though I just don't like signing them until I have to Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hershie Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I'm the opposite, I don't like signing real players. I like to have the element of surprise with my players and enjoy the fact that no one else will have managed my players. Renewfredgens* are easier to love. fwiw, I've always said "regen" but recently started using the Brock-approved "newgen". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hershie Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 is that politically correct term for them these days? i stand corrected. bloody newgens. taking our jobs. lol:D I think a politically correct varient would be more "reality deficient sporting participant" or something. :o Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samb_95 Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 If you don't like regens, newgens or freds, you won't get very far in the game because the real players are not sustainable unlike the regens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerish Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 I'm with dafuge, there's allure in a name you haven't heard before - one of the reasons I sign so many foreign players, which come back to kick me in the nuts when I get tons of international call-ups and I NEVER LEARN. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeeman27bob Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 Not Freds? This forum's got far too many of them already... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Lad Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 For some reason, none of my regens have faces. It used to be that only the hair showed up, now nothing does -- I'm sure this is an issue that's been addressed but I fear it may slow down my computer even more if they do show up (although the game lags when clicking on any regen -- maybe it's because it can't find a face?). And furthermore, I'm afraid that if the faces do show up I'll discover that all my regens are really ugly. Ignorance is bliss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ife Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 Like TC ,regens to used to be my worst part of fm and when i reached the point when my game was full of regens,id almost quit.but now they are major part of why i play,imagine scouting the whole world to find an 18 yr old almost as good as rooney and for a bargain price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
solstar Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Not really a newgenist but I cant stand their faces. They all look like they've been to Pandora and forgot the blue dye. So will try to sign one without a mugshot if possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Not really a newgenist but I cant stand their faces. They all look like they've been to Pandora and forgot the blue dye. So will try to sign one without a mugshot if possible. Or just turn off the faces? Please don't tell me you hunt around for newgens with no faces? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koki Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 I actually like the newgen faces. I also prefer signing newgens because I don't know what their PA is. Often I don't sign real-existing players that look promising because I think 'If I haven't heard about him, his PA is probably not that high'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grep Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 I am not able to spot newgens ( i miss the way to do that ) but the average age of my team is 22 After a promotion from league 1 to Championship I am now looking for Premier ( 3rd ! ) and my gems are increasing so quickly in their values that sooner or later I have to lobotomyze the chairman to prevent him from ruin the team climbing for success. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leto2626 Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Newgens rock, real players are predictable ... it's like real women, most of them are predictable, but all women in fantasy are fascinating ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjericho Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 regens/newgens are very overrated. i always have 15 year olds with lots of 16s and 17s and strikers with great defensive attributes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 I am not able to spot newgens ( i miss the way to do that ) but the average age of my team is 22 After a promotion from league 1 to Championship I am now looking for Premier ( 3rd ! ) and my gems are increasing so quickly in their values that sooner or later I have to lobotomyze the chairman to prevent him from ruin the team climbing for success. If they have the funny faces that people mention, then they are newgens Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
solstar Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Or just turn off the faces?Please don't tell me you hunt around for newgens with no faces? Actually I do! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uMustang Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Newgens rock, real players are predictable ... it's like real women, most of them are predictable, but all women in fantasy are fascinating ! Women are predictable? If you figured out how women think you must be a genius! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grep Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Women are predictable? If you figured out how women think you must be a genius! Usually they are, 90% of them are predictable.... I like the remaining 10 % but they are rare Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
solstar Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Usually they are, 90% of them are predictable.... I like the remaining 10 % but they are rare Very rare Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Usually they are, 90% of them are predictable.... I like the remaining 10 % but they are rare Almost 1 in 10 rare Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.