Cha Cha Cha Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 This is a feature that definitively needs to be toned down. I have started a new game with Santos in brazil and I'm not able to sign players from Sao Paulo or Corinthians (Santos rivals) even if they are transfer listed. Another background feature that works only in negative... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RawrrrFace16 Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 Why would rivals want to sell players to each other especially in Brazil? No toning down needed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
drogba Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 I have to say I agree with the what he's saying partly in that a player often has an underlying commitment to the club, despite the situation. For instance, having never played for Chelsea in 4 seasons and on the transfer list, Nemanja Matic still insists on rejecting a contract offer that would triple he's wages because it's Chelsea's apparent fierce rivals (Crystal Palace). This is also despite the fact that we're pushing for a CL place, so I understand where your coming from in that IRL there are many examples of players leaving for local rivals and that it seems to be too absolute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troneas Posted February 7, 2010 Share Posted February 7, 2010 the trend in brazil right now is to get argentinean players :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cha Cha Cha Posted February 7, 2010 Author Share Posted February 7, 2010 Why would rivals want to sell players to each other especially in Brazil? No toning down needed. For the money? And why "especially in brazil"? I understand key or important players but surely not reserve or transfer listed players. It's stupid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.