dan-wafc Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 Not sure whether this has been posted before, but I didn't know what to search for so here goes: Has anyone noticed the inexplicable purchases that most teams seem to make once you get two-three seasons into the game? It's usually the bigger teams that do this, and the players in question are generally unused and released at the end of their contract. For example, Liverpool bought Johan Elmander for £1m in January, despite his contract expiring in that summer. They proceded to play him precisely zero times, then released him in the summer. Another example: Brian Stock, of Doncaster, went from League 1 to Olympique Lyonnais for £2m, played three games and was released at the end of his three year contract. Again, Liverpool bought Tal Ben Haim for £8.25m in the summer, he started two games, then they didn't give him a squad number, and he's inelegible for any more games until January. This isn't a rant or a complaint, I just thought it might need highlighting in case it's a known issue and can be rectified. For an otherwise brilliant game, this little problem sometimes ruins the realism. Does make me laugh sometimes though, makes European qualification easier! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reli515 Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 I've noticed Real Madrid do this a lot, as will Barcelona in my game. They'll buy a player for 10-30m (euros) and then the player will just happily sit on the bench for a number of years, hardly playing at all (if at all). Seems like a bug to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troneas Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 i think they buy them for their experience to tutor youngesters, as a solid (can' go wrong) backup for their team; or maybe to boost player morale start a new season. coaching real madrid, i have 150m euro to spend starting my third season and i simply don't know what to spend it on, since i'm happy with my current team. maybe the AI feels the urge to spend it even if its not the best of deals (whats 1m when you have 150m to spend on unnecessary reinforcements)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerpuss Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 I've also seen numerous examples of this. Harry Kewell moved to Barca for €12m and they barely used him. LuaLua moved to Napoli for €7m and he's rubbish. And I've seen teams buy players who have contracts that are about to expire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nev147 Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 This has always been the case on FM. It seems to be getting better each year though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRealMagpies Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 Only marginally better I also notice the AI buyers players that have no use in thier perferred formation stuff like -- AI Manager prefers a 442, but buys a Pure wingback not a D/WBx ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edle Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 This has always been the case on FM. It seems to be getting better each year though. Better as in it happens more often? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romanista. Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 This has always been the case on FM. It seems to be getting better each year though. :confused: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eldeniro Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 To be fair......real life does produce some strange transfers as well, like Liam Miller to Man United a few years back, or even Robbie Fowler's return to Anfield...that type of thing. It does happen more often in FM though admittedly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmone Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 I also complained this. Would be nice, if they could make it a bit more realistic! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suge Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 R. Madrid have just bought 33 y/o Fat Ronaldo for £9m on my game. He's played about 12 games since they sold him to AC Milan a few years ago for £2m. Seems abit strange. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubey84 Posted January 26, 2010 Share Posted January 26, 2010 To be fair, Chris Smalling going to Manchester United would have been ridiculed only two months ago. I guess transfers that come across as odd do happen. However, it is a problem in FM and it only gets worse when the regens start coming in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PGB_SPURS_FM09 Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 makes you wonder what the "polish" actually did for the transfer system Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
atonement Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 its one of those things that spoils long term games when the top teams effectively commit finanical suicide by signing aging players for £15m plus in consecutive sesons, then your own shrewd signings and success all seems a bit hollow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lork Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 yeah it is very strange Ai transfers. but this must be a hard problem to fix, any ideas how to do it? To be fair, Chris Smalling going to Manchester United would have been ridiculed only two months ago. I guess transfers that come across as odd do happen.However, it is a problem in FM and it only gets worse when the regens start coming in. not from anyone who's seen him play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontask Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 its one of those things that spoils long term gameswhen the top teams effectively commit finanical suicide by signing aging players for £15m plus in consecutive sesons, then your own shrewd signings and success all seems a bit hollow i have to totally agree. the players they go for seem a bit random to me. i was looking yesterday and apart from those who had retired, all the other top players were still at the clubs they started with. im sure a few would of moved inside 6 years Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 The only real odd transfers I get are what Man City buy :confused: They buy like 3 goalkeepers a season, none actually very good! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.