teej9 Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Over a span of three matches Insua, G. Johnson and Agger were just terrible. Awful. Finally against Arsenal they had a combined rating of 6.1. So, like any sensible manager would, I gave them a warning for poor performance. A warning mind you, no fine. Of course they all declared unfair treatment and are now unsettled. The idiots even went as far as saying they were shocked at the warning. There must be a hidden attribute called self-awareness that these three are severely lacking in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamjerome Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 players just aren't real troublemaker crybabies anymore tbh, djalminha back in CM days - now there was the real standard penis of a player Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indi75 Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 I want the "arse" command back, players are far too well behaved these days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teej9 Posted December 3, 2009 Author Share Posted December 3, 2009 players just aren't real troublemaker crybabies anymore tbh, djalminha back in CM days - now there was the real standard penis of a player Hilarious. They all settled down in a week or so...maybe we showed them the tape. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kickballz Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 I've experienced this over several versions. I always just clear them out. In fact I usually don't even sign them in the first place. When you are building a team try to avoid the prima donnas. There is absolutely no point in pandering to players. In a nutshell - when you sign players make sure they are emotionally suitable because it is your reputation at stake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NepentheZ Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Over a span of three matches Insua, G. Johnson and Agger were just terrible. Awful. Finally against Arsenal they had a combined rating of 6.1. So, like any sensible manager would, I gave them a warning for poor performance. A warning mind you, no fine. Of course they all declared unfair treatment and are now unsettled. The idiots even went as far as saying they were shocked at the warning. There must be a hidden attribute called self-awareness that these three are severely lacking in. 6.1 is no grounds for a warning of "Poor performance" IMO. If you take 5 as average (Because its in the middle ) - then 6.1 is a little above average. Thats not a poor performance. A poor performance would be 4.9 or lower, imo, with 5-5.9 being just below average. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teej9 Posted December 3, 2009 Author Share Posted December 3, 2009 That was 6.1 combined* two of them got straight 2's and the other a 2.1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NepentheZ Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 You can't really combine a rating of 3 people. - So they all played bad. Quite strange, but everyone has an off day Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teej9 Posted December 3, 2009 Author Share Posted December 3, 2009 You can't really combine a rating of 3 people. - So they all played bad. Quite strange, but everyone has an off day I know, I just thought it was damn funny... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.