berkshirevilla Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Hello All, Could someone give me the advice i would like... In which order would you put these remarks from your staff. I would just like to know which is best to worst. Quality player Good player Decent player Potential to be a quality player Potential to be a good player Potential to be a decent player Thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gauvner Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 The exact same way you have done yours mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0x0r Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 The exact same way you have done yours mate. Of course, it could be argued that potential to be quality is better than decent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gauvner Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 True i suppose but its the fact that its only potential, he could be worse than a decent player yet have the potential to be a quality player. Still ranks him lower than decent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GillsMan Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 Gauvner is correct, and often (but not always) the players with "potential to be good" will have a lower current ability than players who are "decent", depending on certain factors like age, etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
berkshirevilla Posted November 10, 2009 Author Share Posted November 10, 2009 cheers gauvner, althougth i did have the same thought as r0x0r the the potential would be better than decent but thanks all the same Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCIAG Posted November 10, 2009 Share Posted November 10, 2009 It depends. Check what the coach/scout actually says for their Current Ability, rather than comparing Potential Ability. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.