Confusing press conference results

Hello,

I think SI have made a step forward with press conferences this year, particularly with the conferences called when you sign a big player, and there generally seems to be a bigger variety of questions. Although admittedly I was never one of the people calling out for them to be dropped, as I think they can potentially be a big part of the game, just as press conferences are in real life.

However, I think the variety of answers needs to improve, and stupid ones removed. There seems to be no point in having an answer of "No, I think he'll fail miserably" or whatever to the question "Do you think your new striker will do well for your team?". There only ever seems to be 2 proper answers you can give for each question.

Another point, which is what this topic is about, is confusing results for the answers you give. I just signed Edin Dzeko with Arsenal, and was posed the question "Will this signing see you change the tactics you employ?" I play a 4-3-3 and wanted a big target man to play in the center, which is why I went for him, so I chose "I think Edin can slot into our existing setup quite easily", which I think is a perfectly understandable response, given that I specifically picked him to fit into my system.

However, instead "it seems likely that Edin Dzeko may be unhappy about Clark's negative words". I don't know what objections any player would have being told that they should fit into the squad perfectly, or why my words are deemed negative. Anyone know why?

Perhaps he expected you to build a team around him and feels disappointed that he will considered just one of the team?

Incidently, I agree with you and think he should be happy with the response.