Rohkey Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I just drew 0-0 against Wigan as Chelsea, in part due to Terry being sent off. After the match, my manager said the incident was justified, so I warned Terry (he accepted) and in the post-game press conference announced my original instinct was the call was the right one. Two things kinda baffle me - It said my response would elicit a positive response from Terry (why so?) Also the next day there was a headline "Chelsea felt John Terry should not have been shown a red card." The former, maybe Terry is happy I owned up to it and he felt he deserved the card? The latter, perhaps by "Chelsea" they mean the rest of the players? Can anyone clarify? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPompey Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 You can't win making press comments about in game decisions. At best the FA just "keep quiet" at worst its a fine or a warning Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
postal postie Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Don't know about the second one. But a positive response could mean a willingness to change their ways. I.e they have the managers backing so they want to repay the faith Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rohkey Posted November 3, 2009 Author Share Posted November 3, 2009 You can't win making press comments about in game decisions. At best the FA just "keep quiet" at worst its a fine or a warning Even when I agree with the call? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.