Jump to content

fm 2010 transfer budgets


Recommended Posts

hey can someone that has downloaded the new demo wat the new transfer budgets are from the prem and championship i would install the demo my self but it does not want to work and i have given up :(

but any news on the new budgets would be good as thats all i am reli intrested in

Link to post
Share on other sites

Premier League:

Arsenal : £25m - £33m

Aston Villa : £2.7m - £3.9m

Birmingham City : £6m - £10.5m

Blackburn Rovers : £0k

Bolton Wanderers : £0k

Burnley : £200k - £375k

Chelsea : £52m - £58m

Everton : £4m - £5.25m

Fulham : £500k - £750k

Hull City : £5.5m - £10.5m

Liverpool : £2m - £2.4m

Manchester City : £55m - £72m

Manchester United : £60m - £74m

Portsmouth : £0k

Stoke City : £6.5m - £11.25m

Sunderland : £10m - £16m

Tottenham Hotspur : £6m - £8.5m

West Ham United : £0k

Wigan Athletic : £4.5m - £7.25m

Wolverhampton Wanderers : £5.75m - £10m

Championship:

Barnsley : £120k - £200k

Blackpool : £600k - £975k

Bristol City : £1.6m - £2.4m

Cardiff : £0k

Coventry : £2m - £3.3m

Crystal Palace :£0k

Derby : £500k - £800k

Doncaster : £900k - £1.5m

Ipswich : £2.9m - £4.3m

Leicester : £0k

Middlesbrough : £2m - £2.6m

Newcastle : £0k

Nottm Forest : £700k - £1.1m

Peterborough : £600k - £1.2m

Plymouth : £600k - £1m

Preston : £1.2m - £1.6m

QPR : £6m - £9m

Reading : £200k - £250k

Scunthorpe : £350k - £650k

Sheff Utd : £2m - £2.4m

Sheff Wed : £0k

Swansea : £1.9m - £2.9m

Watford : £250k - £350k

West Brom : £2.3m - £2.6m

League One:

Brentford : £0k

Brighton : £200k - £325k

Bristol Rovers : £300k - £475k

Carlisle : £0k

Charlton : £0k

Colchester : £600k - £925k

Exeter : £30k - £55k

Gillingham : £50k - £85k

Hartlepool : £50k - £85k

Huddersfield : £400k - £625k

Leeds : £1m

Leyton Orient : £100k - £140k

Millwall : £100k

MK Dons : £50k

Norwich : £500k - £650k

Oldham : £20k - £28k

Southampton : £1.5m

Southend : £0k

Stockport : £10k - £20k

Swindon : £50k - £80k

Tranmere : £20k

Walsall : £50k - £75k

Wycombe : £0k

Yeovil : £8k - £12k

SPL

Aberdeen : £0k

Celtic : £8.5m

Dundee United : £26k - £30k

Falkirk : £0k

Hamilton : £100k - £160k

Hearts : £100k - £150k

Hibernian : £150k - £200k

Kilmarnock : £0k

Motherwell : £50k - £75k

Rangers : £0k

St. Johnstone : £200k - £350k

St. Mirren : £75k - £130k

La Liga:

Almeria : £3m - £4.4m

At. Madrid : £5.25m - £6.75m

Athletic : £5.25m - £7m

Barcelona : £13m

Deportivo : £875k - £1.2m

Espanyol : £2.6m - £3.8m

Getafe : £3.5m - £5.75m

Malaga : £350k - £500k

Mallorca : £875k - £1.2m

Osasuna : £875k - £1.4m

R. Madrid : £8.75m

Racing : £2.2m - £3m

Sevilla : £6.5m - £9m

Sporting : £425k - £675k

Tenerife : £700k - £1.3m

Valencia : £875k - £1.1m

Valladolid : £425k - £700k

Villarreal : £6m - £8.25m

Xerez - £0k

Zaragoza - £4.3m - £6.5m

Serie A:

AC Milan : £13m - £16.5m

Atlanta : £2.3m - £3.4m

Bari : £575k - £950k

Bologna : £2.1m - £3.5m

Cagliari : £1.5m - £2m

Catania : £2.2m - £3.6m

Chievo : £525k - £875k

Fiorentina : £7.75m - £10.75m

Genoa : £5.25m - £7.75m

Inter : £13m - £16.75m

Juventus : £10.5m - £11.75m

Lazio : 3.9m - £5.25m

Livorno : £750k - £1.3m

Napoli : £8.25m - £13.25m

Palermo : £4.3m - £6m

Parma : £3m -£4.9m

Roma : £0k

Sampdoria : £4.3m - £7m

Siena : £1.2m - £2m

Udinese : £2.3m - £3m

Link to post
Share on other sites

Newcastle is right, £0, and a minimum expectation of winning the league :(

The budget sounds right:thup:

I am still playing with the transfer window update for 09DB from sortitout...

and Newcastle have just bought Carrick for £20m...he is also on 80k a week:thdn:

not realastic at all

the FM10 reflects the current situation better;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The budget sounds right:thup:

I am still playing with the transfer window update for 09DB from sortitout...

and Newcastle have just bought Carrick for £20m...he is also on 80k a week:thdn:

not realastic at all

the FM10 reflects the current situation better;)

I didnt say it wasn't realistic! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its pretty realistic that at Liverpool you have little starting money to spend, but what is the reason stated at the start for the low budget? Likewise for West Ham and Pompey?

Pompey will certainly have better funds on full game release as their takeover has gone through since the demo release (and birmingham's)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Likewise for West Ham and Pompey?

Given that two of West Ham's directors have taken a pay reduction in order that the club may afford to sign Guillermo Franco - and that the club's sponsors, SBOBET, fronted the money for Alessandro Diamanti - I'd say it's just about right. The club have made it clear since early summer that they have been working on a sell-to-buy policy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Shoome and Walsh - but I was more wondering whether the board said anything regarding the low budgets especially at Liverpool. I think it would be quite a challenge for once to lead Liverpool to some sort of dominance with low budgets each season with the yanks being there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This realistic budgets argument is secondary really. This team should have this, this team should have that. If people want realism, then they should tick the "dont allow budgets during the first window" box as the summer transfers are already there. Just my opinion....

Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Yeh I do that baker.simon. Makes the initial transfer window boring but definitely mirrors real life as you dont end up with Man.City having spent 100 million on 5 more world class players and portsmouth having brought in another 10 players and there being so many new players that its farcical.

Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Yeh I do that baker.simon. Makes the initial transfer window boring but definitely mirrors real life as you dont end up with Man.City having spent 100 million on 5 more world class players and portsmouth having brought in another 10 players and there being so many new players that its farcical.

Real Madrid being another example of this ^^^.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This realistic budgets argument is secondary really. This team should have this, this team should have that. If people want realism, then they should tick the "dont allow budgets during the first window" box as the summer transfers are already there. Just my opinion....

I've never really taken that option but I've figured that, like me, you manage Newcastle right? Given that they already start with nothing to spend and about £7,000 left of their wage budget, does the 'don't allow budgets during first transfer window' box affect that at all or does it remain the same? And does it also mean that selling players in nigh on impossible? I'm not sure I can stomach paying a virtual Nicky Butt for a whole year before his contract expires.

I like of idea of using the option though to prevent too much shake-up prior to the beginning of the season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it realistic that Barca only have 13 million??

Perfectly so. Barca already spent a lot on Chirgynwinski or whatever his name is and Ibrahimovich. Not likely to spend anymore.

United have a huge budget because they did not spend the Ronaldo money

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...