Thomasmc135 Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 Turn off relegation from League 2 to BSP and make it so that it (it being non-league football) replicates the format of league football so Prem, Champ, L1, L2 and this would make them (non-league teams) more competitive etc. Also scrap all the Football Leagues in England and place 92 clubs in 1 league that takes place over 5 years, the winner gets £1 billion to compensate for all the wages etc paid, and it gets scaled down. The only issue is I feel that with 184 matches a season a red card should be worth a 15 match ban. Would that be excessive or okay considering the extended season? Also how would Europe work because the season would finish every 5 years so would it be possible to have the Top 4 teams from default (United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool) represent England for the 5 years? If anyone could give their own opinion (and rate my ideas) it would be of great help to me in my attempt to make the greatest league ever. See below if you were confused about the Non-League format I worked out that 3/38 = 0.0789... So 0.0789...x184 = 14.5263... so 15 matches seems about right EDIT: Hopefully I can do this, if possible I'd get rid of all draws, penalty shootout at the end of the match. EDIT#2: 2 points per win, just to keep the league closer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
silva_gunner Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 Only a little bit over the top. But if you want to play it go ahead mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACJMY2K Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 I actually would like to give that a crack! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasmc135 Posted September 18, 2009 Author Share Posted September 18, 2009 I actually would like to give that a crack! Thanks mate, a lot of thought has gone into this but I don't know if it would work. Mainly due to the potential issues with Europe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lower Leagues Rule Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 I don't believe it would be possible to base it over a five year season. Other than that the splitting of a league system into seperate leagues actually sounds like an interesting idea. Sucks to be at the top of BSP though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasmc135 Posted September 18, 2009 Author Share Posted September 18, 2009 On the tutorial video it said that you can choose the number of rounds and the start/finish date so I see no reason for not being able to have a 5 year season. BSP would be the Premiership of the non-league, it's so that teams don't yo-yo which tends to happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death. Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 Reading it, for some reason i thought you were on about real-life. "LUNATIC" was going to be my response. Then i caught on. The new league editor will be really interesting i think. The most obvious idea is to create a Super League of course, but ideas like this are things i've thought of before myself. Having one huge league will be... interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stantoner Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 in some countries they have champions at the half way stage, so maybe the top 4 every may qualify for that years CL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasmc135 Posted September 18, 2009 Author Share Posted September 18, 2009 Reading it, for some reason i thought you were on about real-life. "LUNATIC" was going to be my response. Then i caught on. The new league editor will be really interesting i think. The most obvious idea is to create a Super League of course, but ideas like this are things i've thought of before myself. Having one huge league will be... interesting. In real-life it would get so boring. In a game I think it could be fun, I always get bored after 3 seasons or so, this would keep me interested longer. Also it would prove who the best team in England is. Imagine Chelsea going down to Aldershot (Hampshire) mid-week and then having to travel to Bradford on the weekend, it would take it's toll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Aja Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 This sounds like a right laugh tbh. It's ideas like this that are making me really excited about FM10 - I'm going to spend an age just camped in the editor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Colonel Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 This sounds like a right laugh tbh. It's ideas like this that are making me really excited about FM10 - I'm going to spend an age just camped in the editor. Likewise. Just so many possibilities, I cant see the game getting boring for a lot longer than previous editions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hozhoz Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 There is no need to increase the ban length for red cards because there are more chances to get one, for example if you got a red every 2 games then: 19/38 = 57 game ban = 1.5 season length ban 92/184 = 276 game ban = 1.5 season length ban, with your idea it was a 1380 game ban which is 7.5 seasons long. No idea why you thought you'd need increase ban length. Otherwise interesting but probably impossible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Aja Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 Impossible is nothing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasmc135 Posted September 18, 2009 Author Share Posted September 18, 2009 There is no need to increase the ban length for red cards because there are more chances to get one, for example if you got a red every 2 games then:19/38 = 57 game ban = 1.5 season length ban 92/184 = 276 game ban = 1.5 season length ban, with your idea it was a 1380 game ban which is 7.5 seasons long. No idea why you thought you'd need increase ban length. Otherwise interesting but probably impossible. Mainly just to give me a laugh. I had scaled it down from a 100 match ban to 15 matches. It'd teach them not to get sent off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lower Leagues Rule Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 On the tutorial video it said that you can choose the number of rounds and the start/finish date so I see no reason for not being able to have a 5 year season. My belief in this would be that it means choosing the start date during the year, for example some leagues start in January, not a 5 year long season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasmc135 Posted September 19, 2009 Author Share Posted September 19, 2009 My belief in this would be that it means choosing the start date during the year, for example some leagues start in January, not a 5 year long season. That would really upset me, 184 matches in 1 year Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reading\'s Revolving, Rant Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 I really like the idea of a 5 year season with all clubs in it - hope this gets made once the game comes out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
superbocksuperstar Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 I think the highest number of teams you can have in one division is 30. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr8kc Posted September 21, 2009 Share Posted September 21, 2009 I think each team would need a huge squad for this. Injuries and a 15 game ban for a red card could result in a lot of teams running low on players. You'd need strong reserve and youth teams all the way down the division to make it work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phnompenhandy Posted September 21, 2009 Share Posted September 21, 2009 I think the highest number of teams you can have in one division is 30. I believe that's correct. Also, bumbling about in midtable from 30th to 50th place for 5 years would be mind-numbing for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomasmc135 Posted September 22, 2009 Author Share Posted September 22, 2009 I believe that's correct.Also, bumbling about in midtable from 30th to 50th place for 5 years would be mind-numbing for me. LOL, that would be so annoying, just not being involved in any major battles for 3 years until the start of the new season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Football Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 I'd certainly have a go. Sounds really interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.