arsenal_2111 Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 Good, erm, night guys:thup: I have just started the 2014/15 season as Arsenal, and have had Watford as my feeder club since season 1. I'm a fan of Watford in real life. Last season they ended up getting relegated from the Championship. They also have no money, and I mean NO money. They have transfer listed their whole squad to 'lower the wage bill'. In fact, they have sold/released 10 players in the summer just to lower the wage bill. As Arsenal I have quite a few reserve players who don't make the first team. Do you think it is acceptable to send as many players to them as possible to ensure that they have a team to field (they only have 13 players now)? Or do you think this is cheating, as it is unrealistic that a club would loan one other club so many players. I'd appriciate your views on this. Thanks, Jammy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neilio Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 I think its a viable option tbh... If Watford are in big trouble then why wouldn't a parent club help out? They could have really strong links, especially after several years. Remember that you are essentially loaning out players to give them games/experience, you'd just be lending them to the same club. When Luton went tits up with the whole administration thing, loads of clubs lent them players with no fee and no wages to be paid... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAK Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 i always send most of the players i loaning to same club to try and get them promoted, better league, better expirence for ur players. it diff not cheating Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakobx Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 its just a game. You can do all you want. You can even add a new manager and manage watford for a while so you can rebuild their squad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeeman27bob Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 I don't see why not. Obviously it isn't the most realistic thing, but I don't see why It wouldn't happen in real life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larsson1888 Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 You could think of it the players you loan out are more likely to start and get first team experience. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sobek Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 Its not partly realistic to loan out a job lot of players (RL clubs are unlikely to be so altruistic), but i'd say go ffor it. You can't have your favourite club suffering like that! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mullers Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 Isn't it only possible for a team to use only 4 loan signings in a squad? Might just be for Premier League! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsenal_2111 Posted April 7, 2009 Author Share Posted April 7, 2009 Isn't it only possible for a team to use only 4 loan signings in a squad? Might just be for Premier League! Yeah, unfortunately you can only loan 4 players to them. But I'm sure they'll help. Thanks for the comments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alurny Posted April 7, 2009 Share Posted April 7, 2009 Loan them a backbone (keeper, DC, MC, FC) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsenal_2111 Posted April 7, 2009 Author Share Posted April 7, 2009 Loan them a backbone (keeper, DC, MC, FC) I kind of did that. GK, DC, MCd, AMC. None of my strikers wanted to go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.