sparey Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 I've seen teams such as ac milan, inter co-owning players, but when i (playing as arsenal) go to offer the same co-ownership deal, its not allowing me to do so, is there a reason why? It seems i can only enquire/fully buy or loan the player, when i would rather co-own. Thanks, James Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrari312 Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 I think (don't quote me on this!) that co-ownership is something that can only be arranged between two Italian teams. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevicus Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 Only italian teams can co-own players, you will heve to negotiate a transfer with both owning teams to make the player yours, and only yours. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparey Posted March 10, 2009 Author Share Posted March 10, 2009 oh okay, so what happens if AC and Inter both own a player, and i only buy out Inters half? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenArsenal Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 oh okay, so what happens if AC and Inter both own a player, and i only buy out Inters half? You have to buy both, otherwise the transfer won't go through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevicus Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 oh okay, so what happens if AC and Inter both own a player, and i only buy out Inters half? then the transfer collapses! Think logically, would a player like to travel to and from england every week? I dont understand why this transfer system is in place in Italy, but AFAIK, it is the only country where such deals exist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparey Posted March 10, 2009 Author Share Posted March 10, 2009 You have to buy both, otherwise the transfer won't go through. that sucks. oh and thanks for the quick reply folks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AB-forever Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 then the transfer collapses!Think logically, would a player like to travel to and from england every week? I dont understand why this transfer system is in place in Italy, but AFAIK, it is the only country where such deals exist. He wouldn't have to travel every week Both teams own a part of the player but he only plays for one of them (and they pay 100% of his wages). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dar2000 Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 He wouldn't have to travel every week Both teams own a part of the player but he only plays for one of them (and they pay 100% of his wages). To slightly add to that, he would play every second season with each team. Adriano was a well known recent example, owned by Inter and Parma until Inter bought him outright. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AB-forever Posted March 10, 2009 Share Posted March 10, 2009 To slightly add to that, he would play every second season with each team. Adriano was a well known recent example, owned by Inter and Parma until Inter bought him outright. Not in the game. When a team buys 50% of a player the two clubs decide for how many years the player is coowned. For all of tht period he plays for the same team. After that certain amount of years (maximum of 3 I think), if none of the clubs have bought the other club's half, both clubs must submit an anonymous bid to the FA and the club that made the highest bid gets the player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.