amer Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 It's been nearly week since the release of 9.03 has been an improvement or is the 9.02 patch better! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnyboy Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Yes 9.03 is a huge improvment and it reallly does it for me.only small minor problems i have noticed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EthanM Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.0.3. It had an improved match engine that renewed my interest in watching the match in 3D. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jussiut Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.03 definately. The match engine is superior and I wonder how anyone can say the ME was better in 9.02 (all the one-on-ones etc.). In fact, ME in 9.02 was pretty terrible. The latest patch has definately improved my FM experience a lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Injektilo Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 3 by a landslide. I'm getting none of the problems that people here are complaining about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candre168 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.03 makes the game playable and enjoyable. 9.02 was a disgrace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashOverride Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.03 was for me like buying a new game. The improvements in some areas were just cruicial. I would never go back to 9.2 for anything now! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamilton162 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.3.0 by a mile, less bugs and i haven't found any new bugs so far in almost 1 week of gaming Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamilton162 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Who voted for 9.2.0? Are they seeing things or was it just a voting mistake. I hope they don't seriously think that 9.2.0 is better than 9.3.0 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sucoma75 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 i´ve voted for 9.2.0. because never had so much injuries before, players are called to international duties if i play champions, all my youth players have unreal full time profi contracts ( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeLatics Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.3 by a county mile! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mlp071 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Dunno yet. Voted undecided. 9.3 = overpowered speedy ST , ridiculously strong short passing & wide formation, 100% tackling strong ST is better in kitchen then on field (don't have any injury or goal from corners issues ) 9.2 = way to many one on ones , have to redo all OI's , DFK's very inaccurate, seriously easy to win, Spanish B teams messed up (there was no messy defensive things ) On the fence still. If i work out to have consistent 55+% passing with mixed or direct then will be 9.3, if not then i don't know. Really don't feel like playing short passing in LL since that just doesn't exist there in such effectiveness. Either way i think they both have some bad flaws and some great things. It's just matter of taste. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Dean Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.3, why would 9.2 be better? So many bug fixes and match improvements. I dont get why some people want to keep bugs in return for a match engine that supposedly is better with more bugs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
david22 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.0.2 was awful, even 9.0.1 was better than that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_trojan Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Dunno yet. 9.3 = overpowered speedy ST , ridiculously strong short passing & wide formation, 100% tackling strong ST is better in kitchen then on field (don't have any injury or goal from corners issues ) 9.2 = way to many one on ones , have to redo all OI's , DFK's very inaccurate, seriously easy to win, Spanish B teams messed up (there was no messy defensive things ) On the fence still. If i work out to have consistent 55+% passing with mixed or direct then will be 9.3, if not then i don't know. Really don't feel like playing short passing in LL since that just doesn't exist there in such effectiveness. Either way i think they both have some bad flaws and some great things. It's just matter of taste. I also voted 9.02 for more or less the same reasons as yourself, play with two fast forwards with run with the ball option, play short and wide regardless of your team, talent and weather, and you are onto a winner, but seriously IRL who is their right minds would instruct their lower league team to go out and play like Arsenal, seriously unrealistic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.rooney Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.0.3 definately. The major issues I think with 9.0.2 was the ridicolous amount of one on one chances that were created with a huge percentage then missed. This has been solved in 9.0.3 and the match engine has improved as a result. Although I have noticed a definate increase in the number of injuries, this is not as frustrating as seeing my team time and again ripped apart by punts up the field to the opponents with an inevitable one on one to follow on (and miss) on 9.0.2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indi75 Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 9.3.0 by a country mile, but then the poll overwhelmingly concludes this to be the case anyway. Well done SI tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPlanet Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Anyone who says 9.2 is nuts! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Vet Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 9.03 no contest, but it is only because 9.02 was near unplayable. However for the first time in 17 years I am not enjoying playing(FM09 as a whole). There is still a long road to go to make FM10 a viable purchase for me. Maybe i'll just wait until SI gets things right - and take some leaps forward. To me this game set them back, despite good intentions. Maybe it is about time they realize that it isn't a good idea with an annual release, as it is too short of a timeframe to make steps forward and make it work proberly. This version more than any other showed this to be the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Girondins Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 #3 has its faults, but it produces more fluid football, with more variety and better defending than #1 or #2 did. Yes corners are back and so are long shots, but on reflection I prefer a game that actually has these and free kicks going in than never at all. #2 was mechanical, truly terrible. There was no link up play hardly, long balls were king. It truly sucked. #1 reminded me of the Budwieser adverts, with MultiBall . Way too many goals form long shots and corners. My only critricism with #3 is there don't seem to be any hand balls and my major criticism: What the hell is going on with off sides? There are loads of goals given where the player/s are miles offside and likewise disallowed when they are clearly onside. Ok now and then, but happens a lot to me .. ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickH Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Surely you dont even need to ask?? 9.0.3 is far superior.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glennb73 Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 9.3.0 by a mile Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bieritarier Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 #3 has its faults, but it produces more fluid football, with more variety and better defending than #1 or #2 did. Yes corners are back and so are long shots, but on reflection I prefer a game that actually has these and free kicks going in than never at all.#2 was mechanical, truly terrible. There was no link up play hardly, long balls were king. It truly sucked. #1 reminded me of the Budwieser adverts, with MultiBall . Way too many goals form long shots and corners. My only critricism with #3 is there don't seem to be any hand balls and my major criticism: What the hell is going on with off sides? There are loads of goals given where the player/s are miles offside and likewise disallowed when they are clearly onside. Ok now and then, but happens a lot to me .. ? I agree with most of that, except I don't think there are actually too many long shot goals int 9.3.0 (well, I haven't seen that many, and if so, it's my central mid with 19 long shots and 19 technique. And then, other than deflected shots (a few over more than 50 matches), he only scores if he's really wide open at 25-30 yards out). Regarding hand balls: Yesteday evening I conceded a penalty because my central mid thought he was Karabatic. Likewise I've had several calls, both in favor and against my team for handballing, especially long kicks to the strikers or high crosses. Also didn't really notice any real offside problems yet... maybe that's because I'm using the roof camera in 3 d view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.