AJetsOf Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 ddm = determination + discipline + motivating strength, aerobics fit * 9 + ddm * 2 >= 270 -> 7 >= 240 -> 6 >= 210 -> 5 goalkeeper gk * 2 + ddm >=90 -> 7 >=80 -> 6 >=70 -> 5 tactics tac * 2 + ddm >=90 -> 7 >=80 -> 6 >=70 -> 5 ball control tec * 6 + men * 3 + ddm * 2 >=270 -> 7 >=240 -> 6 >=210 -> 5 defense def * 8 + (tac + ddm) * 3 >=360 -> 7 >=320 -> 6 >=280 -> 5 attack att * 6 + tac * 3 + ddm * 2 >=270 -> 7 >=240 -> 6 >=210 -> 5 shooting tec * 6 + att * 3 + ddm * 2 >=270 -> 7 >=240 -> 6 >=210 -> 5 set pieces (att + men + tec) * 3 + ddm * 2 >=270 -> 7 >=240 -> 6 >=210 -> 5 example: strength, aerobics fit 20 + ddm>= 45 =7 fit 19 + ddm>= 50 =7 fit 18 + ddm>= 54 =7 fit 17 + ddm>= 59 =7 goalkeeper gkp 20 + ddm>= 50 =7 gkp 19 + ddm>= 52 =7 gkp 18 + ddm>= 54 =7 gkp 17 + ddm>= 56 =7 gkp 16 + ddm>= 58 =7 gkp 15 + ddm>= 60 =7 tactics tac 20 + ddm>= 50 =7 tac 19 + ddm>= 52 =7 tac 18 + ddm>= 54 =7 tac 17 + ddm>= 56 =7 tac 16 + ddm>= 58 =7 tac 15 + ddm>= 60 =7 defense def 20 + (tac+ ddm)>=67 =7 def 19 + (tac+ ddm)>=70 =7 def 18 + (tac+ ddm)>=72 =7 def 17 + (tac+ ddm)>=75 =7 def 16 + (tac+ ddm)>=78 =7 def 15 + (tac+ ddm)>=80 =7 Example Some people have difficulty understanding the way I presented it, so here's an example: Open Meulensteen in the data editor: det=18 dis=18 mot=18 ddm=18+18+18=54 tac=15 att=18 def=12 Tactics Rating: 15 *2 + 54 = 84 -> 6 star Attack Rating: 18 *6 + 15 * 3 + 54 *2 = 261 -> 6 star Defense Rating: 12 * 8 + (15 + 54) * 3 = 303 -> 5 star In a game where a coach (here I used Reulensteen as an example) has those stats, that's the training star rating they will get, as computed above. Depending on your luck, you might get a better or worse Reulensteen than the default setting. Norwegian translation at: www.fmnorge.com (thanks Hattijr) Chinese translation at: game.ali213.net (thanks ggamer) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyssien Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Thanks a lot. Weird that "Working with youngsters" is not part of the equation for youth training. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJetsOf Posted February 27, 2009 Author Share Posted February 27, 2009 Not sure how it is set, but it wasn't a factor in the star numbers in 08 and earlier 09 patches. Probably a more hidden effect with youngsters I would assume. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmfaria Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Great job, mate! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 i was just doing this now. oh well great work thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kritik Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 in for later, thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJetsOf Posted February 27, 2009 Author Share Posted February 27, 2009 I posted this in another forum and some people didn't understand so I'll give an example: Open Meulensteen in the data editor: det=18 dis=18 mot=18 ddm=18+18+18=54 tac=15 att=18 def=12 Tactics Rating: 15 *2 + 54 = 84 -> 6 star Attack Rating: 18 *6 + 15 * 3 + 54 *2 = 261 -> 6 star Defense Rating: 12 * 8 + (15 + 54) * 3 = 303 -> 5 star Of course, in game the numbers float a bit so it's not exactly spot on until you start a game and look at the numbers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
13xForever Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 great post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiN8 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 This is awesome. Can I ask you how you came up with the formulas? I'd imagine it's quite tough to come up with the weights for each of the attributes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobMUFC08 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I posted this in another forum and some people didn't understand so I'll give an example:Open Meulensteen in the data editor: det=18 dis=18 mot=18 ddm=18+18+18=54 tac=15 att=18 def=12 Tactics Rating: 15 *2 + 54 = 84 -> 6 star Attack Rating: 18 *6 + 15 * 3 + 54 *2 = 261 -> 6 star Defense Rating: 12 * 8 + (15 + 54) * 3 = 303 -> 5 star Of course, in game the numbers float a bit so it's not exactly spot on until you start a game and look at the numbers. I hate seeming like an idiot and asking whats probably a stupid question but i dont completly understand, i dont get the *2 bit like for the tactics rating its 15 *2 + 54=84, wheres the *2 come from? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I posted this in another forum and some people didn't understand so I'll give an example:Open Meulensteen in the data editor: det=18 dis=18 mot=18 ddm=18+18+18=54 tac=15 att=18 def=12 Tactics Rating: 15 *2 + 54 = 84 -> 6 star Attack Rating: 18 *6 + 15 * 3 + 54 *2 = 261 -> 6 star Defense Rating: 12 * 8 + (15 + 54) * 3 = 303 -> 5 star Of course, in game the numbers float a bit so it's not exactly spot on until you start a game and look at the numbers. yeh the editor imo is misleading. u can't find more than 3 7* coaches if u use the editor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I hate seeming like an idiot and asking whats probably a stupid question but i dont completly understand, i dont get the *2 bit like for the tactics rating its 15 *2 + 54=84, wheres the *2 come from? i'll try to post a more straight forward one and see i u can understand that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
13xForever Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 the example was a tactical coach his tactics was 15 so u multiply that by 2 which gives you 30. then u add the DDM which is 54 30+54 would come to a 6 star tactics coach as shown in the first post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobMUFC08 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 the example was a tactical coachhis tactics was 15 so u multiply that by 2 which gives you 30. then u add the DDM which is 54 30+54 would come to a 6 star tactics coach as shown in the first post Thats what i thought but for different coaches its multiplied by different numbers and i couldnt figure out why so i didnt think it was that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
13xForever Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 im not maths boff but AJETSOF must use the *(number) to give a more accurate higher number to be sure the formula was right then hes broke it down into the examples. just a way of checking really Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 ok try this. if u have a coach who has 20 for tactics his ddm should egual to 50 for u to get a 7* rating 19 for tactics his ddm should equal to 52 18 for tactics his ddm should equal to 54 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
celebritykiller Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 ddm = determination + discipline + motivatingstrength, aerobics fit * 9 + ddm * 2 >= 270 -> 7 >= 240 -> 6 >= 210 -> 5 goalkeeper gk * 2 + ddm >=90 -> 7 >=80 -> 6 >=70 -> 5 tactics tac * 2 + ddm >=90 -> 7 >=80 -> 6 >=70 -> 5 ball control tec * 6 + men * 3 + ddm * 2 >=270 -> 7 >=240 -> 6 >=210 -> 5 defense def * 8 + (tac + ddm) * 3 >=360 -> 7 >=320 -> 6 >=280 -> 5 attack att * 6 + tac * 3 + ddm * 2 >=270 -> 7 >=240 -> 6 >=210 -> 5 shooting tec * 6 + att * 3 + ddm * 2 >=270 -> 7 >=240 -> 6 >=210 -> 5 set pieces (att + men + tec) * 3 + ddm * 2 >=270 -> 7 >=240 -> 6 >=210 -> 5 example: strength, aerobics fit 20 + ddm>= 45 =7 fit 19 + ddm>= 50 =7 fit 18 + ddm>= 54 =7 fit 17 + ddm>= 59 =7 goalkeeper gkp 20 + ddm>= 50 =7 gkp 19 + ddm>= 52 =7 gkp 18 + ddm>= 54 =7 gkp 17 + ddm>= 56 =7 gkp 16 + ddm>= 58 =7 gkp 15 + ddm>= 60 =7 tactics tac 20 + ddm>= 50 =7 tac 19 + ddm>= 52 =7 tac 18 + ddm>= 54 =7 tac 17 + ddm>= 56 =7 tac 16 + ddm>= 58 =7 tac 15 + ddm>= 60 =7 defense def 20 + (tac+ ddm)>=67 =7 def 19 + (tac+ ddm)>=70 =7 def 18 + (tac+ ddm)>=72 =7 def 17 + (tac+ ddm)>=75 =7 def 16 + (tac+ ddm)>=78 =7 def 15 + (tac+ ddm)>=80 =7 Hats off to you for all the effort you've put in there! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yonezzz Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Oh, many thanks for this! Do we know, though, whether someone who just scrapes into the 7-star category will give worse training results than someone who has 20 for all relevant categories (for example, a goalkeeper coach who had 20 for gk, mot, det, and disc)? Or is it (still?) a case that you only need to aim for a light workload? Sorry if these are all common knowledge but I'm still new to these things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 well what i would like to know is with a 7 star training do the players improve their attributes quickly or is this just another cosmetic feature? do we really need 7* training say for a youngster who has a PA of 190? does he achieve his PA quickly or will it improve at a normal rate? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobMUFC08 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I actually understand now, thanks for simpifying it for me everyone, and of course thanks AJetsOf for coming up with this. I was pretty embarassed by the amount of people who understood and i didnt because i unreal at maths at school lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
13xForever Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 a 7 star is a 7 star coach so more over the number wont affect. but its always better to get them abit over the required number as coaching stats can go down like players stats. shame u cant train staff or put them on coaching courses Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
celebritykiller Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Oh, many thanks for this! Do we know, though, whether someone who just scrapes into the 7-star category will give worse training results than someone who has 20 for all relevant categories (for example, a goalkeeper coach who had 20 for gk, mot, det, and disc)?Or is it (still?) a case that you only need to aim for a light workload? Sorry if these are all common knowledge but I'm still new to these things. I would expect the higher the better as to code only 7 discrete levels of training would be a bit simplistic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 but do players improve quickly like this or normal? thats a question i'd like someone to answer. SI we need help Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
13xForever Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 MAZ its combined first team football and training but having better coaches will improve him more. i mean if you have 6 stars on every coach im sure he will reach his potential maybe abit more slower then 7 stars. if you had 1 stars in every coach is unlikely he will become as good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 ok thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yonezzz Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I would expect the higher the better as to code only 7 discrete levels of training would be a bit simplistic. As would I! I guess that does mean that there is another formula that we don't know about, related to attribute increases and rates thereof, and it might be rather more complex. I guess in the meantime I'll just aim for as many stars as possible! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB11 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Cheers for that! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyssien Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Oh, many thanks for this! Do we know, though, whether someone who just scrapes into the 7-star category will give worse training results than someone who has 20 for all relevant categories (for example, a goalkeeper coach who had 20 for gk, mot, det, and disc)?Or is it (still?) a case that you only need to aim for a light workload? Sorry if these are all common knowledge but I'm still new to these things. 13xForever gave you a good answer. Realistically speaking, even if the game takes more levels into account for coaching (which I seriously doubt, because it wouldn't make sense from the programmer's perspective), this is bound to make such a little difference, that it is not going to be discernible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
catafan Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Great stuff! It seems there is impossible to get a 7-star coach in some category all over the world Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil-The_Almighty Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I ran the numbers and on a quick run through this should show what stats are needed in whats positions based on the above formula. fit det dis mot = 20 180 20 40 20 40 5 10 270 270 20 180 20 40 19 38 6 12 270 20 180 20 40 18 36 7 14 270 20 180 20 40 17 34 8 16 270 20 180 20 40 16 32 9 18 270 19 171 20 40 20 40 10 20 271 270 19 171 20 40 19 38 11 22 271 19 171 20 40 18 36 12 24 271 19 171 20 40 17 34 13 26 271 19 171 20 40 16 32 14 28 271 18 162 20 40 20 40 14 28 270 270 18 162 20 40 19 38 15 30 270 18 162 20 40 18 36 16 32 270 18 162 20 40 17 34 17 34 270 18 162 20 40 16 32 18 36 270 17 153 20 40 20 40 19 38 271 270 17 153 20 40 19 38 20 40 271 GK det dis mot = 20 40 20 20 10 90 90 20 40 20 19 11 90 20 40 20 18 12 90 20 40 20 17 13 90 20 40 20 16 14 90 19 38 20 20 12 90 90 19 38 20 19 13 90 19 38 20 18 14 90 19 38 20 17 15 90 19 38 20 16 16 90 18 36 20 20 14 90 90 18 36 20 19 15 90 18 36 20 18 16 90 18 36 20 17 17 90 18 36 20 16 18 90 17 34 20 20 16 90 90 17 34 20 19 17 90 17 34 20 18 18 90 17 34 20 17 19 90 17 34 20 16 20 90 tac det dis mot = 20 40 20 20 10 90 90 20 40 20 19 11 90 20 40 20 18 12 90 20 40 20 17 13 90 20 40 20 16 14 90 19 38 20 20 12 90 90 19 38 20 19 13 90 19 38 20 18 14 90 19 38 20 17 15 90 19 38 20 16 16 90 18 36 20 20 14 90 90 18 36 20 19 15 90 18 36 20 18 16 90 18 36 20 17 17 90 18 36 20 16 18 90 17 34 20 20 16 90 90 17 34 20 19 17 90 17 34 20 18 18 90 17 34 20 17 19 90 17 34 20 16 20 90 tec(ball control) men det dis mot = 20 120 20 60 20 40 20 40 5 10 270 270 20 120 19 57 20 40 19 38 8 16 271 20 120 18 54 20 40 18 36 10 20 270 20 120 17 51 20 40 17 34 13 26 271 20 120 16 48 20 40 16 32 15 30 270 19 114 20 60 20 40 20 40 8 16 270 270 19 114 19 57 20 40 19 38 11 22 271 19 114 18 54 20 40 18 36 13 26 270 19 114 17 51 20 40 17 34 16 32 271 19 114 16 48 20 40 16 32 18 36 270 18 108 20 60 20 40 20 40 11 22 270 270 18 108 19 57 20 40 19 38 14 28 271 18 108 18 54 20 40 18 36 16 32 270 18 108 17 51 20 40 17 34 19 38 271 17 102 20 60 20 40 20 40 14 28 270 270 17 102 19 57 20 40 19 38 17 34 271 17 102 18 54 20 40 18 36 19 38 270 def tac det dis mot = 360 20 160 20 60 20 60 20 60 7 21 361 20 160 19 57 20 60 19 57 9 27 361 20 160 18 54 20 60 18 54 11 33 361 20 160 17 51 20 60 17 51 13 39 361 20 160 16 48 20 60 16 48 15 45 361 19 152 20 60 20 60 20 60 10 30 362 360 19 152 19 57 20 60 19 57 12 36 362 19 152 18 54 20 60 18 54 14 42 362 19 152 17 51 20 60 17 51 16 48 362 19 152 16 48 20 60 16 48 18 54 362 18 144 20 60 20 60 20 60 12 36 360 360 18 144 19 57 20 60 19 57 14 42 360 18 144 18 54 20 60 18 54 16 48 360 18 144 17 51 20 60 17 51 18 54 360 18 144 16 48 20 60 16 48 20 60 360 17 136 20 60 20 60 20 60 15 45 361 360 17 136 19 57 20 60 19 57 17 51 361 17 136 18 54 20 60 18 54 19 57 361 att tac det dis mot = 270 20 120 20 60 20 40 20 40 5 10 270 20 120 19 57 20 40 19 38 8 16 271 20 120 18 54 20 40 18 36 10 20 270 20 120 17 51 20 40 17 34 13 26 271 20 120 16 48 20 40 16 32 15 30 270 19 114 20 60 20 40 20 40 8 16 270 270 19 114 19 57 20 40 19 38 11 22 271 19 114 18 54 20 40 18 36 13 26 270 19 114 17 51 20 40 17 34 16 32 271 19 114 16 48 20 40 16 32 18 36 270 18 108 20 60 20 40 20 40 11 22 270 270 18 108 19 57 20 40 19 38 14 28 271 18 108 18 54 20 40 18 36 16 32 270 18 108 17 51 20 40 17 34 19 38 271 17 102 20 60 20 40 20 40 14 28 270 270 17 102 19 57 20 40 19 38 17 34 271 17 102 18 54 20 40 18 36 19 38 270 tec(shooting) att det dis mot = 270 20 120 20 60 20 40 20 40 5 10 270 20 120 19 57 20 40 19 38 8 16 271 20 120 18 54 20 40 18 36 10 20 270 20 120 17 51 20 40 17 34 13 26 271 20 120 16 48 20 40 16 32 15 30 270 270 19 114 20 60 20 40 20 40 8 16 270 19 114 19 57 20 40 19 38 11 22 271 19 114 18 54 20 40 18 36 13 26 270 19 114 17 51 20 40 17 34 16 32 271 19 114 16 48 20 40 16 32 18 36 270 18 108 20 60 20 40 20 40 11 22 270 270 18 108 19 57 20 40 19 38 14 28 271 18 108 18 54 20 40 18 36 16 32 270 18 108 17 51 20 40 17 34 19 38 271 17 102 20 60 20 40 20 40 14 28 270 270 17 102 19 57 20 40 19 38 17 34 271 17 102 18 54 20 40 18 36 19 38 270 att(set pieces) men tec (sub tot) det dis mot = 270 20 20 20 180 20 40 20 40 5 10 270 20 20 20 180 20 40 19 38 6 12 270 20 20 20 180 20 40 18 36 7 14 270 20 20 20 180 20 40 17 34 8 16 270 20 20 20 180 20 40 16 32 9 18 270 270 19 19 19 171 20 40 20 40 10 20 271 19 19 19 171 20 40 19 38 11 22 271 19 19 19 171 20 40 18 36 12 24 271 19 19 19 171 20 40 17 34 13 26 271 19 19 19 171 20 40 16 32 14 28 271 18 18 18 162 20 40 20 40 14 28 270 270 18 18 18 162 20 40 19 38 15 30 270 18 18 18 162 20 40 18 36 16 32 270 18 18 18 162 20 40 17 34 17 34 270 17 17 17 153 20 40 20 40 20 40 273 270 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil-The_Almighty Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 PM me and i'll send you the text file if you'd like the data in a nicer format, as I can't figure out how to lay it out propperly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 ddm = determination + discipline + motivatingstrength, aerobics fit * 9 + ddm * 2 >= 270 -> 7 >= 240 -> 6 >= 210 -> 5 [...] How did you get all those theories ? By trying over and over in-game ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
13xForever Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 a nice format would be nice with the above stats im already confused lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Janitor Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Got to say a huge thanks for this. Just noticed my 7* coaches had all vanished (bar Renshaw on "Strength") and with these formulas I've managed to get the best coaches possible so that I have one 7*, seven 6* and one 5* (shooting). Can't do any better than that without unrealistically stealing the likes of McClair and Meulensteen from Man Utd (I'm Man City), so I'm delighted. Cheers! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
drunkpunk Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Many thanks to AJetsOf for working the formula out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick1408 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I really don't understand the formula. I think I must be a bit simple. Has someone made a set of filters we can download? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hattijr Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Excellent work by AJetsOf !! Can i post it on a another Norwegian called forum ? ( www.fmnorge.com ) Where you offcourse get all the credit :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skoolblowsme Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Very impossible to get 7* coaches now! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uppercut Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 this has to be the most important thread out there since 930 was released.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffious Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Why did they change this and make it so hard? I had lovely perfect 7-star coaches across the board and now they're all 3/4 stars. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coop Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 It's as well that I'm good at Maths. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 to be honest it should of been like this from the start. imo they got the timing all wrong and the way they've done it is wrong aswell. IMO they could of put in say 30 - 50 7* coaches and these coaches would only sign for highly reputable clubs. now you really wouldnt expect man utd or real madrid to have 5* coaches when its teams like these that are competing to be the best. thoughts? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oncho Shaldzhiyan Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 wow, great work m8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizzy D Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 I don't get much out of the first post. I take my fys coach in Arsenal Tony Colbert. He has 18 in fitness, 12 Determination, 18 Discipline and 14 in Motivation and I take what said in the first post. Fit = 18 * 9 + ddm * 2 but thats 412 and still I only got a six start training... Whats its It am doing wrong here guys ? am I counting it wrong or what ? 412 is not even on your first post or something close ;E Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffious Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 I think the problem (if there is one) is that top clubs don't sign the top coaches and set up top training systems. It's far too hard now IMO, I've just done a quick search for DDM14+ and there was 38, that's without the coaching-specific attributes, so there's very few 7*s about; and I have good scouting knowledge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 I think the problem (if there is one) is that top clubs don't sign the top coaches and set up top training systems.It's far too hard now IMO, I've just done a quick search for DDM14+ and there was 38, that's without the coaching-specific attributes, so there's very few 7*s about; and I have good scouting knowledge. yeh i did the same using the pre game editor and got the same result or there abouts. but it is just daft unless the regen coaches are any good then no one will really have a 7* coach. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
awa1 Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 I don't get much out of the first post. I take my fys coach in Arsenal Tony Colbert. He has 18 in fitness, 12 Determination, 18 Discipline and 14 in Motivation and I take what said in the first post. Fit = 18 * 9 + ddm * 2 but thats 412 and still I only got a six start training... Whats its It am doing wrong here guys ? am I counting it wrong or what ? 412 is not even on your first post or something close ;E Are you sure you calculated properly? I got 250 from the stats you given, so it falls under >= 240 -> 6 and below >= 270 -> 7, which means is 6 stars. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyssien Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 I don't get much out of the first post. I take my fys coach in Arsenal Tony Colbert. He has 18 in fitness, 12 Determination, 18 Discipline and 14 in Motivation and I take what said in the first post. Fit = 18 * 9 + ddm * 2 but thats 412 and still I only got a six start training... Whats its It am doing wrong here guys ? am I counting it wrong or what ? 412 is not even on your first post or something close ;E We have, Fit*9 = 18*9 = 162 ddm*2 = (12+18+14)*2 = 44*2 = 88 So, Fit*9 + ddm*2 = 162 + 88 = 250 Your coach has 250 coaching points. 250 is greater than 240 but smaller than 270, so he gets 6 stars. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maz Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 colbert would need 18 in fitness and 18 for ddm. his total ddm should come to 54 to get 7* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffious Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 yeh i did the same using the pre game editor and got the same result or there abouts. but it is just daft unless the regen coaches are any good then no one will really have a 7* coach. Well, the present set of coaches are bad enough. I doubt the regens will be better and I don't wanna have to wait for them. I don't see why they needed to change it, the game's hard enough as it is. The top clubs and best managers should employ the best coaches anyway, why restrict the supply? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.