conman07 Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 does liverpool always go into recievership because i been offered the job but they seeem to be losing money all the time and do u know if a tycoon takes over Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juve_curr Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 reply instantly? I genuinely "LOLed" at that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
atonement Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 reply instantly? I genuinely "LOLed" at that. yeah, very commanding Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jod123 Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 You won't get many replies at this time Anyway, it depends on the game. Sometimes they will and sometimes they don't. You can survive by being successful though so they should not. I never had a team go into receivership when I am the manager and I have managed Man United who have bigger loan repayments than Liverpool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cityull Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 your going to get nowhere with that attitude mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhoy Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 He just wants quick answers because he wants to know if he should take the job. Personally mate, I wouldn't take the chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aiston Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 He just wants quick answers because he wants to know if he should take the job. Personally mate, I wouldn't take the chance. A please would of been nice, not "reply instantly" though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhoy Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 He could be younger and meant to type please reply instantly. People shouldn't jump on him because he worded that he wants a quick answer wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canny Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 Doing fine with Liverpool in my game. I was careful and didn't spend all my transfer budget in the first season though, or more accurately couldn't afford all the players I wanted and sold players to cover most of what I did buy. I've also had 3 failed takeovers though, 1 of which blocked most of a transfer window. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jod123 Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 He could be younger and meant to type please reply instantly. People shouldn't jump on him because he worded that he wants a quick answer wrong. You are very gullible. It worked for him though anyway. He got loads of replies, more than I though at this time of night. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zebedee77 Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 You won't get many replies at this time Anyway, it depends on the game. Sometimes they will and sometimes they don't. You can survive by being successful though so they should not. I never had a team go into receivership when I am the manager and I have managed Man United who have bigger loan repayments than Liverpool. They also have a much bigger cashflow than Liverpool so the analogy is a tad flawed - if you manage to get Manchester United to go bust then you deserve a prize for incompetence or are trying to do it very, very hard. Liverpool don't always go into receivership though, it can be avoided fairly easily although you may have to sell players if they've got themselves into a genuine mess in a game. Hoping for a takeover is always a tad risky. May never happen, and if it does, it may not happen in a way you want it to - it could mean you being transfer embargoed for months... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jod123 Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 They also have a much bigger cashflow than Liverpool so the analogy is a tad flawed - if you manage to get Manchester United to go bust then you deserve a prize for incompetence or are trying to do it very, very hard. Liverpool don't always go into receivership though, it can be avoided fairly easily although you may have to sell players if they've got themselves into a genuine mess in a game. Hoping for a takeover is always a tad risky. May never happen, and if it does, it may not happen in a way you want it to - it could mean you being transfer embargoed for months... That makes it even though. United have a bigger cashflow and bigger repayments while Liverpool are smaller on both counts. So you still should not go into administration with Liverpool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlo116 Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 That makes it even though. United have a bigger cashflow and bigger repayments while Liverpool are smaller on both counts. So you still should not go into administration with Liverpool. It depends on the difference between the debts and the inflows because in some cases clubs will have a slightly larger debt but perhaps twice the inflow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zebedee77 Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 That makes it even though. United have a bigger cashflow and bigger repayments while Liverpool are smaller on both counts. So you still should not go into administration with Liverpool. Not if you start with them no, but if the OP is being offered the job then I'm guessing he's not started with them It doesn't even up though - Manchester's revenue far exceeds their debt repayments so if you don't try to bankrupt them, they won't go bust. Liverpool needs more careful handling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadbloke Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 when i was managing Liverpool, they got taken over, and my transfer budget dropped from £22 million to £0 as soon as the new chairman was in. I got so annoyed - had to cancel all my summer signings! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jod123 Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 Not if you start with them no, but if the OP is being offered the job then I'm guessing he's not started with them It doesn't even up though - Manchester's revenue far exceeds their debt repayments so if you don't try to bankrupt them, they won't go bust. Liverpool needs more careful handling. That is only if you are successful. If you fail to manage finances properly then you can easily bankrupt them. Some people on here have come on asking how to manage them without this happening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluenose_92 Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 I wouldn't take it because they're Liverpool . Also the risk of financial uncertainty if you don't win everything is too great Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnyboy Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 Liverpool are a poor team leave them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smeddum Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 I once had Motherwell team that went into admin three times in three years (in an old champ man) i was very succesfull though so new boards came in and i spent all here oney lol was silly but won 5 titles Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LouisW Posted February 15, 2009 Share Posted February 15, 2009 what year is this in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.